Political leadership is number one issue in managing disaster risk - study
BY EDMUND SMITH-ASANTE
Political
leadership is more important than a city’s wealth, when it comes to protecting
the lives and economic assets of cities and towns from disasters, a new study
launched by the UN two years ago has established.
The
study of a major urban safety campaign, the “Making Cities Resilient Report
2012”, provides a global snapshot of how local governments reduce disaster risk
and was undertaken by a team from the London-based International Institute for
Environment and Development (IIED), led by Senior Fellow, Dr. David
Satterthwaite.
Commenting
on the study, Dr. Satterthwaite stated: “The Making Cities Resilient campaign
is proving that despite a rise in extreme weather events and the threats posed
by climate change, urbanisation does not have to lead to an increase in risk.”
He
said “Where city and local governments demonstrate leadership and competence in
working with low-income populations living in informal settlements, flood impacts
can be reduced and the threats from other natural hazards minimised.”
According
to him, “Cities which understand how to prevent recurring losses will thrive
and the campaign is motivating over 1,000 cities and towns to get a better
handle on how to reduce their risk and avoid loss of life and damages.”
The
Making Cities Resilient Campaign was launched today, September 4, 2012, by the
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR) after it was announced for the
first time in human history that over 50% of the world’s population now live in
cities and urban areas.
Launching
the report at the World Urban Forum in Naples, France, Margareta Wahlström, the
UN Special Representative for Disaster Risk Reduction, said: “Economic losses
to disasters have averaged at least $100 billion annually over the last twenty
years,” and that “most of this damage can be avoided through better risk
management and investment in social and structural infrastructure.”
She
stated that “The 40-plus cities profiled in this report were able to leverage
whatever resources they had, including the creativity of their citizens, to
reduce the impact of disaster events on their communities,” disclosing; “Six
months after joining the campaign the local government of Siquirres in Costa
Rica took action on flood protection and in February 2012 the usual annual
flooding was avoided.”
“
There are many cities like Siquirres, which are proving that if you manage your
risks, you build your resilience to disasters and avoid unnecessary disruption
in the home and the workplace,” she stressed.
Also
commenting on the study, the report’s author, Dr. Cassidy Johnson, University
College, London, said: “The straightforward simplicity of the Campaign’s Ten
Essentials is a key strength of the Campaign. These guidelines provide local
leaders with a strategic framework to prioritise areas and approaches to
disaster risk reduction and to chart progress.”
Adding
her voice to comments on the campaign, Helena Molin-Valdes, UNISDR Campaign
Director, said: “The Campaign provides a critical forum for local authorities
to raise awareness, learn about disaster risk reduction, share ideas and
identify solutions. The association with an UN-affiliated global Campaign gives
local authorities a sense of empowerment, which usually translates into
tangible actions and policies.”
The
campaign, which now has 1,050 members ranging from major metropolises such as
San Francisco, Copenhagen, Cape Town and Mumbai to small towns in countries
such as Austria and Pakistan, asks members to sign up to Ten Essentials for
urban disaster risk reduction.
On
the other hand, the new study includes interviews with mayors and city managers
from around the world and finds that for the majority the most important
“essential” is putting in place the organisation and coordination to understand
and reduce risk.
Also,
one of the highlights of the report is that the majority of the 200 million
people affected by floods, earthquakes and other natural hazards each year are
urban dwellers.
Further, across all the cities analysed in the report,
the five types of activities occurring most frequently are; taking
disaster risk reduction into account in new urban planning regulations, plans
and development activities and establishing councils/committees/disaster
management structures dedicated to disaster risk reduction.
The
others are; constructing hazard-resistant infrastructure or improving existing
facilities; establishing education/awareness/training programmes and citizen
participation/multi-stakeholder dialogues.
Another
important trend noticed in the report is the extent to which cities are
integrating disaster risk reduction into other local government activities,
including education, livelihoods, health, environment, and planning, either by
incorporating risk considerations into existing activities or initiating
projects that address multiple issues simultaneously.
Comments
Post a Comment